I was in the back row of a smallish theatre. The set was a minimalist, black scaffolding arrangement with a few rows of benches in tiers up one side, on which sat a dozen or so actors dressed in costumes that made them look like devils from Hieronymus Bosch's paintings - half-rabbit/half-fish things, armoured beetles with pitchforks and so on. On the stage in front of them, an actor whom I somehow knew was playing an alchemist delivered a long speech castigating the demons for their wickedness. He was dressed as the fat little creature who is roasting a man on a spit in the Last Judgment: blue skin, white hair, giant feet and a great pot belly.
Two men were sitting near me, chatting about what they had been doing that day. I couldn't believe that they could be so rude and stupid and it only took me a little while to work up the courage to ask them to stop, which they did.
On stage, a stream of tiny demons -- child actors in amazing costumes -- were somehow materialising. I stood up to see if I could work out how the effect was being achieved and saw, behind some sort of drape, that there was a trap door through which an adult was pulling the children before tossing them across the stage, where another adult caught them. As I watched, a tiny demon was pulled out of the trapdoor. It looked like an egg with a pointy hat on and wings and a tail and was so small that I supposed the child couldn't be more than two years old. The first adult threw the toddler into the air, but the catcher missed it, and it bounced helplessly across the stage. This struck me as just about the funniest thing I had ever seen and I howled with laughter.
Notes for Freudian Analysis
I spent the first half of this month reading a book on Bosch. It took so long to read because I had to spend ages looking at all the interesting things in the paintings. The first part of the book focused on Bosch's criticism of human folly but, overall, it made the case that the obscure imagery in his work is identifiable as mainstream alchemical symbolism of the time. According to the book, Bosch was as rigorous a scientific theorist as Leonardo, his contemporary, except the branch of science that was current in northern Europe at the time -- alchemy -- turned out to be insane nonsense. I'd guess that my dream is supplying me with an image that summarises those two elements. By having an alchemist castigate some foolishly wicked characters, the dream illustrates the first element that I took from the book (human folly) and then, by showing the alchemist to be similar to the demonic figures and therefore just as guilty of folly, it deals with the second (that Bosch was a sort of scientist, but followed wholly mistaken theories). However, why my dream would want to do that is beyond me.
Towards the end of January, I saw all three Slab Boys plays. John Byrne, who wrote them, is also a painter. Each night, I wished that they'd got him to design the sets as I kept thinking that if they were more painterly and exaggerated, they'd fit better with the stylised dialogue than the straightforwardly representational ones that they had chosen did.
Waiting to get the train back from Glasgow last night, I saw the woman who played Lucille in the Slab Boys.
I would consider it extremely bad form to laugh uproariously at an unfortunate mistake on the stage, but it seemed quite alright for me to do so in the dream. Is there some sort of link between Bosch criticising foolish people while adhering to foolish theories and me telling the two men near me to be quiet just before being equally rude myself? Am I taking this Freudian thing too far?